Showing posts with label pigpen. Show all posts
Showing posts with label pigpen. Show all posts

Wednesday, 13 February 2008

Codice Olindo, cipher thoughts...

Yesterday, I posted up a low-resolution image of some Codice Olindo ciphertext: it appears to be a set of slightly-accessorized 8-directional arrows (and a few double-headed arrows, plus some additional shapes (punctuation?)). It struck me when I woke up this morning that - statistics aside - this might simply be a kind of arrow-based pigpen cipher, where the arrows point to the appropriate corner of the 3x3, and the accessorization indicates which 3x3 block to refer to.

Typically, modern-day code-breakers focus (if not over-focus) on the transcription and computer analyses. However, people are sometimes motivated by quite different things from pure security - the psychology is at least as important. Pigpen is easy because you can decrypt it very fast (an arrow-based pigpen would be at least as quick to read as a 'proper' one), and perhaps this is what Olindo Romano wanted. And it seems likely to me that he thought/thinks he's cleverer than all the people around him (whether that's true or not).

Of course, this is the kind of approach I have used when looking at the Voynich Manuscript, so it should come as no surprise that this is how I look at things. I wonder: if the Italian "mathematicians" who have deciphered this cipher plotted out the letters they have found on 3x3 arrow-pigpen grids, what would they find?

Tuesday, 15 January 2008

Pigpen cipher gravestone...


Here's a nice piece of historical cryptography I hope you'll appreciate: a piece of "pigpen ciphertext" engraved on a 1792 New York gravestone, on Flickr. There's another (not quite so good) image of the same thing most of the way down on this page on forgotten New York sights. But before you click anywhere, try and decode it for yourself from the transcription I've put above!

Hint: the single-dot box appears four times, and is (just as you'd expect) a vowel. :-)

If you want to know more, the article mentioned on the page was from the Meyer Berger column on page 24 of the New York Times, January 2nd 1957, and is in the paper's online archive: they charge non-subscribers $3.95 for a PDF, if you happen to be reaaaaaaally interested. But maybe this is a sensible place to stop...